<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excited about distributed SCM - Darcs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/</link>
	<description>Donkies Bloggin' for Donkies</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: UnderpaidLoveMonki</title>
		<link>http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderpaidLoveMonki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/#comment-5864</guid>
		<description>Here's a comparison of darcs versus other SCM tools:

http://changelog.complete.org/posts/528-Whose-Distributed-VCS-Is-The-Most-Distributed.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a comparison of darcs versus other SCM tools:</p>
<p><a href="http://changelog.complete.org/posts/528-Whose-Distributed-VCS-Is-The-Most-Distributed.html" rel="nofollow">http://changelog.complete.org/posts/528-Whose-Distributed-VCS-Is-The-Most-Distributed.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rippee</title>
		<link>http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/#comment-4996</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rippee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/#comment-4996</guid>
		<description>Of course they are not new, but they are quite cool.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they are not new, but they are quite cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderpaidLoveMonki</title>
		<link>http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/#comment-4995</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderpaidLoveMonki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/#comment-4995</guid>
		<description>Try Mercurial:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7724296011317502612&#038;q=Google+techtalks+engEDU

Distributed scms are not new.  There's git, bazaar, bzr2, mercurial...

btw, Perforce is centralized scm, just like cvs and subversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try Mercurial:</p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7724296011317502612&#038;q=Google+techtalks+engEDU" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7724296011317502612&#038;q=Google+techtalks+engEDU</a></p>
<p>Distributed scms are not new.  There&#8217;s git, bazaar, bzr2, mercurial&#8230;</p>
<p>btw, Perforce is centralized scm, just like cvs and subversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/excited-about-distributed-scm-darcs/#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>Wow, that's amazing! For anyone that ever worked with CVS or Subversion this might not sound like earth-shattering features, but for those of us who are stuck with some horrendous piece of source control as (unmentionable system, rhymes with "drowned") this is very drool-worthy. I think the most important feature is the ease of configuration and maintenance. The big question: how stable is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s amazing! For anyone that ever worked with CVS or Subversion this might not sound like earth-shattering features, but for those of us who are stuck with some horrendous piece of source control as (unmentionable system, rhymes with &#8220;drowned&#8221;) this is very drool-worthy. I think the most important feature is the ease of configuration and maintenance. The big question: how stable is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
